Fri, Nov 11 2016
It has been two days now since the election, and I’m still carrying a sinking feeling in my stomach. It reminds me of times in the past when something really bad has happened, like a car accident or falling off my bike, and I keep replaying in my mind how it could have just gone differently. Maybe if I think hard enough, if I just close my eyes and concentrate, I can undo what happened. This is the denial part of grief.
But in two days I’ve come to many realizations about what happened in this election, what it means for the progressive movement in the United States, and what it will mean for us as a country.
It’s easy to laser focus in on one thing, but this was a confluence of many factors. I think the biggest is probably just a general feeling of disenfranchisement among working class white people. For them, this election was a chance to raise a big middle finger to the “elites”. The politicians who have been promising things and never delivering, the media who has been going on and on about “political correctness” that brings them no benefits but only scorn, and the global trade regime that has gutted their communities of jobs.
They thought that Trump will undo all that. He won’t, he in fact can’t, but it doesn’t matter. This election was symbolic for those folks.
To a lesser degree, but a very important one to acknowledge and address, this election was about bigotry. Trump ran explicitly as a white identity candidate. If you’re white, he has your back. If you’re not, watch out. He showed this time and time again in his attacks on Mexicans, Muslims, and blacks, and his tacit acceptance of the endorsements of KKK and alt-right racist splinter groups.
This election was also, once again, about religion. Religious leaders have convinced their supporters to vote on effectively a single issue - abortion. Evangelical Christians and (to a lesser degree) Mormons believed that the chance to reshape the Supreme Court overruled their abhorrance at the moral conduct of Donald Trump. It overruled the fact that Trump espouses such an un-christian view point that if he didn’t promise to put justices on the court who would overturn Roe v. Wade, I believe he would have been cast as the personification of evil by these religious leaders. I don’t believe these people are bigots - after all they proselytize their religion across racial and gender boundaries. They are not friendly to the LGBTQ community, but otherwise I can’t believe they agreed with Trump on most of his unhinged rhetoric.
Finally, this election was about sexism and the double standard for women in our society. Hillary Clinton has a long record of public service, and a simultaneously long record of being attacked for her appearance, her comportment as a first lady both in Arkansas and in the White House, and for all manner of made up conspiracies. This election’s bizarre focus on her emails (which she handled just like previous Secretary of State Colin Powell, as well as numerous members of Congress), was just the latest in a string of attempts to attack and discredit her. I truly believe that these attacks came as a result of her being a woman principally - she had the audacity to break into the boy’s club of national politics in the 80s and 90s.
What Now For Progressivism?
I think there is a great future for progressive causes. As the saying goes, it’s darkest before the dawn, and I do believe we’re on the precipice of a structural change in beliefs on the acceptability of bigotry and sexism. Just take a look at this map:
If only millenials had voted, that would’ve been the result. A landslide beyond anything we’ve ever seen before. Change is coming.
That doesn’t mean the progressive movement can rest on its laurels. The next generation is being shaped right now by how we react to this setback. Take this elementary school mock election in NYC that had to be canceled because some of the children started chanting “Trump Trump Trump! We don’t want Muslims here!”
If the next generation does not see us fighting for what’s right, this setback could turn into a permanent reversal.
We need to push our elected leaders towards better positions through engagement. That means day to day voicing our support or opposition to congressional votes. That means organizing for and showing up to the mid-term elections in 2018. That means finding primary challengers for candidates in our own party to make it stronger. It means finding people to run for local office and convincing our friends and neighbors to vote for them. It may mean marching in the streets to show the world that we won’t take rollbacks of our freedoms lying down.
Finally, the Democratic party needs to get its shit together and move forward from the Clinton dynasty. That’s over. There are lots of great new leaders emerging in the Democratic party this election, we need to boost them up and out of the shadow of the Clintons and the Debbie Wasserman Shultz wing of the party. I have the deepest respect for Hillary and Bill Clinton, and in fact I believe Hillary probably single-handedly has done the most for the prospect of women in high government roles, simply by soaking up decades worth of vitriol and coming out swinging. But her and her husband’s time is over, and it’s time to move over and make room for the next generation.
Bernie Sanders is probably too old to run again, but he’s not too old to keep pushing the party in the right direction. The Obama’s have a role to play in this as well, but personally I hope they sit back for a year or two and allow new blood to take over. Personally I’d love to see a 2020 ticket involving newly made Senators Kamala Harris and Catherine Cortez Masto, and/or veteran Elizabeth Warren.
Most important though for the future of the movement are the 2018 elections, which will inevitably represent an opportunity to take back at least one part of the government (House or Senate), and actually most importantly, the 2020 local elections.
Why the local elections? Every 10 years, there is a US Census. That Census is used to redraw the congressional districts in 43 of the 50 states. Guess who gets to redraw those lines? You guessed it, state congresspeople. That means that vote for your state senator, representative, or congressperson actually means something. In the past, the Republican party put forth a concerted effort to gain control of state goverments in 2010 precisely for this purpose, and today the effect is that the US House of Representatives will be controlled by Republicans in spite of the fact that Democratic candidates will receive more votes, when aggregated across the country.
That’s an unfair and shitty system, but when you’re faced with a shitty game where the stakes are your values, you have to play. There are other alternatives, like referendums to make redistricting a more fair process, but in the meantime, we gotta do what we gotta do, and win those seats.
What Now For The Country?
Look, this is going to be a tough 4 years. There’s just no denying that. Donald Trump’s prospective cabinet is something out of a liberal’s nightmares. We’re going to see an erosion in our historical alliances with European countries and Canada and Mexico. We could even end up mired in another conflict somewhere in the world if Trump sees geopolitics as a game of poker that he thinks he can bluff his way to victory in.
There are two things I’d like to see happen, though.
First, I’d like to see us push back on what is going to be a solid Republican government every step of the way, if they attempt to roll back gay marriage, the right to choose, marijuana legalization, and healthcare reform. At the end of the day, this may end up in the form of disruptive protests because of the lack of representation for the majority in this country (yes, more Democratic ballots were cast than Republican, and they will control all parts of the government, nonetheless).
Second, on the flipside of this coin, I’d like to see us root for President Trump when he does something right. This is where I’d like to see progressives follow Michelle Obama’s quote “When they go low, we go high”. For the last eight years, Republicans rooted against President Obama, even when he was doing things they agreed with. We’re better than that. Let’s show by example how this democracy should work, and voice our support when something goes right. That’s how you influence policy from the minority position, and that’s how you keep a democracy healthy.
Yes. Yes it does. But despair, moving out of the country, seceding from the union, or disengaging from politics entirely are not the answer. Take your anger and direct it to what will make a difference. Protest. Vote. Campaign. Maybe even run for local office. Most importantly - always take the high road. Set an example for the next generation to be proud of.
Wed, Sep 23 2015
Recently, the drug Daraprim, a generic drug (which means there no longer exists a patent on it), had its price raised from $13.50 per pill to $750 per pill. What gave the story legs though, was the ridiculous attempt of the company's CEO, Martin Shkreli, to defend this in spite of broad public condemnation.
What brought about this situation? It appears that when a drug becomes a generic drug, the original pharmaceutical company that develops it likely continues to sell it. Others join the fray, hoping to undercut the original maker with the same drug, but at a lower cost. Eventually the price reaches some level where the pharmaceutical companies feel that going lower wouldn't benefit them. The demand side is not quite like a normal product, since demand for pharmaceuticals is largely price insensitive, especially for life saving drugs like Daraprim (which can protect AIDS sufferers from death via Toxoplasmosis, and prevent birth defects in pregnant women).
At this point, the companies still manufacturing the drug need to decide "is this worth it?" Depending on the overall demand, it may not be for many of the companies, and they will drop out. What happened with Daraprim, is because the demand was low enough, all companies dropped out but one. Since it is generic, any other company could develop it, but to do so would require a fairly long lead time of research and testing, and an FDA approval process. No company will take on that investment with the price being low.
So, enter Martin Shkreli and Turing Pharmaceuticals. Seeing this situation, what is the rational behavior of Turing? Of course, raise the price to an exorbitant level, wait until competitors enter the market, then lower it back down to the level that no longer sustains competition (the original price). What does Turing lose from this maneuver? Nothing, or at least they would not have, if the public had not decided to seize on the story and create a huge backlash.
In the meantime, AIDS sufferers die, and children are born with crippling birth defects. Whoops, I guess the invisible hand of the market can sometimes reach out and slap people, to death.
What's the solution? Hillary Clinton has proposed a number of things including out of pocket limits on prescription drugs, asking the FDA to clear the backlog for approving generic drug makers, and handing out some requirements to pharmaceutical companies to do more research and justify price increases. I think there's a somewhat simpler solution.
I propose a new department of Health and Human Services called the Generic Drugs Department. The task of this department is to maintain production of all generic drugs that are essential (the definition of this is arguable), and to sell them at a fixed multiple of their amortized cost of production. So, if this hypothetical GDD existed, and the fixed multiple was 10x, they would probably sell Daraprim at something like $15 per pill, assuming it costs about $1.50 to create each pill (all costs included). Turing Pharmaceuticals, who were selling the pill at $13.50 per pill, would still be in business, and probably doing brisk business, since they've undercut the government by $1.50 per pill. They could even raise the price if they wanted up to that $15 level, and the only risk they'd be running would be inviting new competition into the market.
Other benefits of the GDD would be the gainful employment of scientists, doctors, technicians, and manufacturing employees, a profit center for the government, and a steady supply of critical drugs at predictable prices, for programs like Medicaid and Veteran's Affairs. The private sector could easily slip in under that 10x multiple to compete and provide a better service, but the government would always maintain their ability to produce at that price.
It seems like the simplest solution to a market problem - introduce a new market participant.
Mon, Apr 29 2013
Lately I've been having the uncomfortable feeling that the warranty is finally expiring on my body. I mean that in the sense that the period in which we typically, as humans, experience very little in the way of health defects, is coming to a close for me. I'm 28, and maybe that's early. But then again, some people don't make it this long.
A series of unfortunate medical issues have arisen for me in the past year, and don't worry, I won't go into the gory details. It will suffice to just say that they are all things that directly stem from lifestyle choices and habits that I have made over the years. In broad strokes, back pain has finally found me, and gastrointestinal issues (which I actually have experienced to a lesser degree for much longer) have flared up.
Through the years I have tinkered with different diets and exercise regimes, but it has been years since I took a comprehensive look at the way that I live. I suppose that it is the province of the "naturally healthy" to ignore such things - until it is too late. But while it may be too late to prevent anything from happening, it's certainly not too late yet to turn it around.
With that in mind, I hit the library today, and picked up several books that have been on my mind. The first is The Primal Blueprint by Mark Sisson. I've been an on-again off-again reader of Mark's blog, Mark's Daily Apple, but I often found myself not completely understanding his philosophy of diet and exercise. In fact, I have been on the opposite side of several theories he posits, but not out of studied knowledge, rather out of presupposed fact and habitual practice. A case in point is Mark's criticisms of endurance training.
Having been a collegiate cross country runner myself, I know something about the joy of running. However, back when I was practicing running, I wasn't doing it for my health. I was doing it for some mixture of glory, fleeting happiness, and a sense of dedication. I read many things about training philosophies, nutrition for athletes, etc., but I never evaluated whether or not running was conducive to long term good health in a general sense. Mark, as a former endurance athlete himself, and a much more accomplished one himself, has come to that view. I'd like to know more about why.
I don't want my reading of The Primal Blueprint to be superficial, so I picked up some of the source material for Mark's ideas. The first book is Genome: The Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters. Mark talks a lot about epigenetics, which is the study of how the expression of our genetics (nature) can be redirected by environmental and lifestyle factors (nurture). This supposition rests at the basis of Mark's case, and Ridley's work often forms the basis of his justifications.
The last work I picked up on the subject is a section of the book Human Evolutionary Biology called Complex Chronic Diseases in Evolutionary Perspective, which bears particular relevance to me since the ailments I have recently been battling are indeed chronic. The section is written by S. Boyd Eaton, who also shows up frequently as a reference for Mr. Sisson, so it is important to assess the credibility of Eaton's work as well.
In parallel with all this, I do plan to test out the primal eating philosophy, and aspects of the rest of the "Blueprint" as well. In general, the parts that I find the most important of the blueprint are: eat animals and plants, avoid grains and sugars, do lots of low intensity activity, and play. There are other prescriptions, but I find these to be the most important. They are in line with what I have found over the past few years whenever I browsed the latest medical and nutritional research.
That being said, the jury is still out for me on the primal lifestyle as a whole. I plan to give it a thorough study, both through theory and practice. I'm not looking to convince anyone else, I'm simply investigating. I'll be writing up more detailed book reviews of the things I come across in this journey, so stay tuned if you are interested.
Tue, Nov 27 2012
Anyone who uses Confluence, please go and comment and vote on this bug: 419520. If you program much, you know that underscores are often used in variable names, program names, database fields, and any number of other places. If you have a wiki that has a lot of documents in it (our company has thousands), not being able to search for something with an underscore, i.e. user_login, is crippling. You simply can't find large pieces of your knowledge base.
I really hope that someone prioritizes this in the near future at Atlassian. Based on the fact that this has been an issue for 6 years, I'd have to say that at this point I'm going to be advocating for migrating to a different wiki system. Any recommendations for a system in use by over 2000 users and holding over 100,000 documents?
Thu, Jun 14 2012
I recently switched teams at my job, away from the Data team at Milo.com and into eBay, for a special project (I can't say what it is yet, but it's going to be really cool when it comes out). The move had me first programming in Python, iterating rapidly on a new product. Now that we proved out the product, we are porting it to Java, to use the current eBay stack as it exists.
I want to talk about my experience writing Python for Milo and also for our new project recently. In Python, it is often tempting to use advanced features and aspects of functional programming to solve a solution "cleverly." My argument is that any clever solution which makes your code very difficult to understand without prior knowledge of the clever trick, is a net negative for your project and your team. Why is that?
Any time you write code that requires more than 50% of your coworkers to have to consult reference documentation or Stack Overflow questions to understand, you are slowing down the pace of development inside your organization. Of course there are exceptions, but please bear with me before you "well actually" me in the comments. In 90% of situations, it is not necessary.
In programming circles, it's often the case that people are trying to prove they are smart, more than they are trying to get work done. For weekend projects and one-offs that you are going to post to Hacker News, that is fine. However, if you are writing code that will need to be understood, changed, and maintained by other people on your team, and in the future, people you won't even know, you need to tone it down.
A great example of this from a past project was the use of SQLAlchemy coupled with some very complex wrapper code. The wrapper was used alongside vanilla SQLAlchemy code, but actually represented several function calls before it actually got to SQLAlchemy Expression Language. Once there, it injected some special code deep into the internals of the EL, before finally calling the appropriate function.
The question is, as a new developer to a codebase, who doesn't understand what's going on, how long will it take you to figure it out? Modifying the internals of an already difficult to understand library (SQLAlchemy Expression Language attempts to make SQL a series of chained function calls) may be a very clever thing to do, but it might all be for naught when there is a bug that the next person can't find, and he just rewrites your solution in plain SQL. Not only will your clever solution be thrown out, but you've just wasted the next person a lot of time in rewriting it (or, if they were more patient, peeling the onion that is your code).
For me, any time I write some code that makes me say "wow, that's cool!", I immediately step back and make sure I'm not creating something that, to a sufficiently inexperienced person, is equivalent to magic. If I have done something like that, I rewrite it so it's clearly readable. Worst case, I document it to death.
The bottom line for my "no magic" rule is that programming is a team sport, no matter how tempting it is to act like it's a series of individual achievements. The best programmer is the one whose code works, and is understood by newbies.
Fri, Apr 13 2012
I use irssi for IRC, inside a GNU screen session. I wanted to be able to work in other screen windows and be notified when things happen in the channel in irssi. Unfortunately, setting an activity monitor via CTRL-a-M had the bad side effect of triggering every time the clock in the irssi status line changed (once a minute).
Just for others so that they don't have to spend as much time googling as I did, the command you need in irssi to turn off the clock is:
/statusbar window remove time
That will allow you to monitor activity in the GNU Screen window where irssi lives, so that you'll get notifications when things happen in the channel. Making that work for only when your name is mentioned is an exercise left to the reader.
Mon, Apr 09 2012
Facebook acquired Instagram today for a cool one billion dollars.
Who won? Instagram's founders, Instagram's investors, and of course the investors who pitched into the Series B funding round of Instagram, who literally made a 100% profit, overnight. If this were a public company, we would call it insider trading, but since this is private, we just call it "business as usual."
Who lost? Facebook investors, and most important in my opinion, the people who actually built Facebook, its employees. Because you know where a large amount of that $1bn is coming from? Facebook shares, which dilutes the equity of every employee and investor of Facebook (but moreso employees due to the fact that investors typically have liquidation preferences and stack the deck in their own favor). So guess what Facebook employees, that payday you had been hoping for on IPO? It just got knocked down by X%, and I hope for your sake that X is a small number.
This just goes to show that in Silicon Valley, just like Wall Street, it's not what you know, or how hard you work, it's who you know, and how well you are connected. Once you're one of those charmed ones who sits on boards and gets calls telling you to invest in a particular startup because they are about to be acquired at double the valuation you will get, you can write your own ticket. But if you're on the ground, building the technology, you have to assume that all those people will trample over you in their race to get their next hundred million.
Wed, Mar 21 2012
This post is inspired by the Super Saiyan (youtube), who posted on reddit today about his progress on doing insane feats of acrobatics after four years so far of training. Check out the video to be impressed.
The post on reddit brought me to a number of cool links. There is the author of Overcoming Gravity, a book giving a systematic approach to making yourself into someone like the Super Saiyan whose video I linked above. The author did an AMA (Ask Me Anything) on reddit recently where he answers all kinds of questions about the book and bodyweight training in general. Then there is a website where the author posts articles, Eat. Move. Improve which seems like another great source, and is definitely going into my Google Reader account. A comprehensive guide to building your own workout routines is located here.
If you're planning on getting into it, you might need some paralletes, which are the things that Super Saiyan has his hands on during his crazy maneuvers. You can either buy them (and a review), or make them (pdf), depending on your budget and proclivities.
As usual, I'm in information overload mode here, and since I've been sick for the last few days, I can't even go bust out a workout like I normally would with information like this. Anyone care to join in an online training group to get started with this?
Thu, Mar 15 2012
In the early hours of the morning, when your mind is foggy and your body is stiff, it's really tempting to think: "If I just get an extra half hour, I'll feel better." But the reality is almost always that I wake up feeling worse after that half hour, hour, or even sometimes more. Most of the time, I am much better off if I just get out of bed in the morning whenever my body wakes me up naturally.
That's easier said than done, and many mornings it just seems impossible. This morning I had the luxury of accidentally knocking over a glass of water at 7AM, so I was forced to get up and clean it up. In the process, my mind unfogged, my self-discipline turned on, and for the first time this week I was able to get out of bed and go for a run before work.
I feel really great now, and I know I can be productive and get a lot of things done before lunch. On the days that I sleep until 9, 9:30, or even 10, I have a hard time accomplishing anything before lunch, which makes me feel guilty and stay late in the evening, which gives me no time to exercise. A vicious cycle indeed.
Tue, Jan 31 2012
It has been a long time, but the site is finally back up. A few months ago, I was the sole actor in a comedy of errors which resulted in the contents of my site being deleted, all the way back to July of last year. Whoops. I learned a lot about why backing things up is so important.
Tonight I finally mustered up the motivation to get it back up and running. I fixed search, including adding a post-save hook to the Post model to update the ts_vector in Postgres, so that it doesn't have to be triggered by a manage.py command or a CRON job. I took out tagging, because it seems like the django-tagging library is a wasteland. I'll probably go ahead and reimplement that myself, as it is pretty straightforward.
A lot has happened in my life since the last recorded post here, so I'll just go ahead and put it into a list:
- In September, I moved back to the US from the Philippines, to the San Francisco Bay Area.
- After a short search, including interviews at a few great companies, I accepted a job at Milo.com, an eBay company. Milo is a local shopping search engine that allows you to find prices and availabilities for products near you. I work on the data team, developing feed ingestion code in Python, among various and sundry other duties.
- On January 13, 2012, I was married to Frances Kristin Jamille Pansacola Regis, who shall now be known as Frances Kristin Jamille Regis Kotenko. It was the most natural decision, and I am grateful every day for having found such a perfect companion in life.
So that's the gist of it. About this site, I'm going to focus down the topics to purely programming and related subjects. I have written about things as diverse as politics, running, etc., in the past, but I feel the need to build up a body of work that represents me professionally from here on out. In that vein, I'll start highlighting some of the work that I'm doing both at Milo and on the side.
Copyright 2011 Jason Kotenko. All Rights Reserved. Contact me